Could One Define Dynamical Homotopy Groups in WCW?

Abstract

Agostino Prastaro has done highly interesting work with partial differential equations, also those assignable to geometric variational principles such as Kahler action in TGD. The key idea is a simple and elegant generalization of Thom's cobordism theory. It is difficult to avoid the idea that the application of Prastaro's idea might provide insights about the preferred extremals, whose identification is now on rather firm basis. One could also consider a definition of what one might call dynamical homotopy groups as a genuine characteristic of WCW topology. The first prediction is that the values of conserved classical Noether charges correspond to disjoint components of WCW. Could the natural topology in the parameter space of Noether charges zero modes of WCW metric) be p-adic and realize adelic physics at the level of WCW? An analogous conjecture was made on basis of spin glass analogy long time ago. Second surprise is that the only the 6 lowest dynamical homotopy/homology groups of WCW would be non-trivial.  The Kahler structure of WCW suggests that only P₀, P₂, and P₄ are non-trivial. The interpretation of the analog of P₁ as deformations of generalized Feynman diagrams with elementary cobordism snipping away a loop as a move leaving scattering amplitude invariant conforms with the number theoretic vision about scattering amplitude as a representation for  a sequence of algebraic operation can be always reduced to a tree diagram. TGD would be indeed topological QFT: Only the dynamical topology would matter.